AI compliance — EU AI Act and transparency

AI compliance — EU AI Act and transparencyHow the AI features map to the EU AI Act and US state rules, what the product does about each obligation, and what stays with your organisation. As shipped, ATX AnalyticsTable is not a high-risk AI system. The licence agreement states its intended purpose and the excluded uses. Feedback and review are never licence-gated: the ability to say "this was wrong" is an oversight duty, not a feature.

What this page covers

Roles
Dates that matter
Obligations and the controls behind them
What the AI features are not for
What stays with your organisation
Known limits

Settings and controls documented

ATX Institute (ATX AnalyticsTable)
OpenAI, Microsoft Azure, Anthropic, Google, or the maker of an on-premises model
Your organisation
An organisation using it for an Annex III purpose
Tell people they are interacting with AI (Art. 50(1))
Mark AI-generated content in the application (Art. 50(2))
Machine-readable marking outside the application (Art. 50(2))
Human oversight (Art. 14, 26(2))
Logs kept at least six months (Art. 12, 26(6))
Monitoring and informing the provider (Art. 26(5))
Staying out of Annex III and US consequential decisions
Intended purpose and AI literacy (Art. 4)
Data minimisation (GDPR)
Switching AI off

Full page

The full page — procedures and the explanation of every setting — is available to signed-in users.

Glossary terms on this page

ATX Institute on LinkedIn

This site needs JavaScript for the full experience. Every page above is reachable without it.